From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f1920d4a6f558148
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: David Taylor <dtaylor@iquest.com>
Subject: Re: Rational vs SunAda
Date: 1996/09/13
Message-ID: <323A11BB.959@iquest.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 180499113
distribution: world
references: <322DBF90.3B38@ultranet.com> <322E8D26.167E@Rational.COM>
 <322F3A31.3916@mdc.com> <322F8F26.42E4@iag.net> <32305233.6A0C@mdc.com>
 <3231B957.3718@iag.net>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: interQuest Online Services -- Huntsville, AL
mime-version: 1.0
reply-to: dtaylor@iquest.com
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Macintosh; I; 68K)
Date: 1996-09-13T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Dennison wrote:
> 
> James Squire wrote:
> >
> 
> > My point was that the person from Rational was implying that Rational Ada
> > (which is part of APEX) = VADS, and I was contesting that.  Does that
> > make it more clear?
> 
> Yes. But technicaly VADS and APEX are now BOTH "Rational Ada" (which was my
> point). That makes it perfectly legitimate (although confusing) to call VADS
> "Rational Ada".
> 
> I'd make an equation to illustrate my point like you did, but my keyboard
> doesn't have the "is a subset of" character.  :-)
> 
> --
> email    - mailto:dennison@iag.net
> homepage - http://www.iag.net/~dennison

One way of telling the difference between VADS and APEX is 
checking to see whether or not the "Def" or "Show Usage 
(World)" keys work on your keyboard.

dt