From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f1920d4a6f558148 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Dennison Subject: Re: Rational vs SunAda Date: 1996/09/07 Message-ID: <3231B957.3718@iag.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 179106758 references: <322DBF90.3B38@ultranet.com> <322E8D26.167E@Rational.COM> <322F3A31.3916@mdc.com> <322F8F26.42E4@iag.net> <32305233.6A0C@mdc.com> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: The Dennison Family mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada x-mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Win95; I) Date: 1996-09-07T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: James Squire wrote: > > My point was that the person from Rational was implying that Rational Ada > (which is part of APEX) = VADS, and I was contesting that. Does that > make it more clear? Yes. But technicaly VADS and APEX are now BOTH "Rational Ada" (which was my point). That makes it perfectly legitimate (although confusing) to call VADS "Rational Ada". I'd make an equation to illustrate my point like you did, but my keyboard doesn't have the "is a subset of" character. :-) -- email - mailto:dennison@iag.net homepage - http://www.iag.net/~dennison