From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bbba36730ac96f9a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Chris Brand <cbrand@ccgate.hac.com>
Subject: Re: Gov't, non-DoD use of Ada
Date: 1996/09/06
Message-ID: <32304E20.E6B@ccgate.hac.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 178904753
references: <4vnlgn$mko@uuneo.neosoft.com>
 <gwinn-0509961642430001@smc19.ed.ray.com> <50nn37$rpa@uuneo.neosoft.com>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Hughes Canada Systems Division
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; SunOS 5.5 sun4c)
Date: 1996-09-06T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Robert B. Love wrote:
> 
> Isn't Thomson/France bragging they've done 30-some nation's air traffic
> control systems in Ada?  Isn't Canada doing theirs now in Ada?  This
> seems
> like a clear statement of Ada's suitablility for the task and against
> the competence of the AAS managers.
> 

I'm working on the Canadian ATC system, which is almost all Ada.

-- 
Chris
Stating my own opinions, not those of my company.