From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f1920d4a6f558148 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Dave.Mercer@sofkin.ca (David Mercer) Subject: Re: Rational vs SunAda Date: 1996/09/04 Message-ID: <322dd054.108147215@news.nstn.ca>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 178480576 references: <322DBF90.3B38@ultranet.com> organization: Software Kinetics Limited reply-to: Dave.Mercer@sofkin.ca newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-09-04T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Apex v2.0.8F is the latest and Rational only supports a Small subset of the 95 extensions. Enforcement of 83 is simply a switch in the environment. I would look at Thompson Software for a validates 95 compiler. I hear that their Object Ada is pretty good. DAve David Chase wrote: >My company is currently in the process of acquiring Ada development >tools to support a new project. We budgeted for SunAda but I believe >that this is the same as Rational Ada. I have had difficulty in trying >to get answers from Sun and Rational concerning whether the offerings >from both are the same and even whether the current version is validated >Ada95. If so, I would also like to know whether Ada83 compatibility can >be enforced through pragmas or compiler switches. > >If anyone has experience with these products, I'd appreciate some help. >You can post here or Email me at lincom@ultranet.com. >Thanks. > >Dave Chase -- Dave Mercer, MEng, PEng Software Kinetics Ltd. 65 Iber Road Stittsville, Ontario, Canada K2S 1E7 Ph. 613-831-0888 Fax. 613-831-1836 EMail. dave.mercer@sofkin.ca