From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f1920d4a6f558148,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: David Chase <lincom@ultranet.com>
Subject: Rational vs SunAda
Date: 1996/09/04
Message-ID: <322DBF90.3B38@ultranet.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 178471268
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: LinCom Corporation
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I)
Date: 1996-09-04T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


My company is currently in the process of acquiring Ada development
tools to support a new project. We budgeted for SunAda but I believe
that this is the same as Rational Ada. I have had difficulty in trying
to get answers from Sun and Rational concerning whether the offerings
from both are the same and even whether the current version is validated
Ada95. If so, I would also like to know whether Ada83 compatibility can
be enforced through pragmas or compiler switches.

If anyone has experience with these products, I'd appreciate some help.
You can post here or Email me at lincom@ultranet.com.
Thanks.

Dave Chase