From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5ac12f5a60b1bfe
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: f43e6,5ac12f5a60b1bfe
X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public
X-Google-Thread: 101deb,87f6968ed41c9df1
X-Google-Attributes: gid101deb,public
From: Robb Nebbe <nebbe@iam.unibe.ch>
Subject: Re: Ada versus PL/I (was: Re: Ariane 5 - not an exception?)
Date: 1996/09/03
Message-ID: <322BEE4F.6F6D@iam.unibe.ch>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 178146614
references: <Pine.GSO.3.92.960831192310.8449A-100000@nunic.nu.edu>
 <50dkud$t7h@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> <50drec$e7h@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>
 <50g701$gah@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Dept. of CS, University of Berne, Switzerland
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.pl1
x-mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (X11; I; SunOS 5.4 sun4m)
Date: 1996-09-03T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


>    He was claiming that PL/I was called "PL/1" before it
> was called PL/I.  I pointed out that the first editions
> of IBM's PL/I manuals called it "PL/I".
> 

Isn't this from a Monty Python sketch?