From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2f7ef46127892c41
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.125.201 with SMTP id ms9mr3325884pbb.3.1336321620051;
        Sun, 06 May 2012 09:27:00 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 pr3ni11189pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: okellogg@users.sourceforge.net
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Little people supporting Ada, possibly through AdaCore?
Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 09:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <32237742.280.1336321619698.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynee1>
References: 
 <12955589.960.1336138013614.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbbfk16>
 <jo157b$1fl$3@speranza.aioe.org>
 <43677.1420.1336161593478.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynjb15>
 <m27gwqv9dq.fsf@pushface.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.33.194.196
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1336321619 23274 127.0.0.1 (6 May 2012 16:26:59
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 16:26:59 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <m27gwqv9dq.fsf@pushface.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=91.33.194.196;
 posting-account=a23u_AkAAAB-Xz81hSqodYsmJRrMwioK
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2012-05-06T09:26:59-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Saturday, May 5, 2012 7:13:37 PM UTC+2, Simon Wright wrote:
> 
> > http://www.okellogg.de/gnat1_handling_of_with_clause.html
> 
> Your note on Par - which is a function, btw -

Thanks for noticing, I'll fix that.

>    I think what you mean is
> that UML does not support stand-alone subprograms?

Right.

> I suppose you could invent a 'package' Global or Library for
> library-level subprograms to live in, cf Standard. Only if it helps!

Yes. As you probably noticed, I've already twisted UML "class" to represent Ada package because UML "package" does not allow subprograms. Along these lines, making a UML class "Standard" should improve orthogonality.

-- Oliver