From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	TO_MALFORMED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10d15b,d730ea9d54f7e063
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d15b,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,dab7d920e4340f12
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,dab7d920e4340f12
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
From: Valentin Bonnard <bonnardv@pratique.fr>
Subject: Re: C is 'better' than Ada because...
Date: 1996/08/27
Message-ID: <322249A3.120D@pratique.fr>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 176642132
references: <31e02c32.342948604@netline-fddi.jpl.nasa.gov>
to: Jon S Anthony <jsa@alexandria>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Internet Way
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.cobol
x-mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Macintosh; I; 68K)
Date: 1996-08-27T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Jon S Anthony wrote:
> 
> I have no issue with "learning" at all.  I have no issue with any of
> this really, I just don't understand why the process has to be one of:
> 
> a) various false statements asserted as though true
> b) Falsity of such statements  pointed out.
> a') more false statements asserted as though true.
> b') more correction
> a'')...
> b'')...
> ...

That's the USENET normal process, I think...

Valentin Bonnard
mailto:bonnardv@pratique.fr
http://www.pratique.fr/~bonnardv (Informations sur le C++ en Francais)










.