From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e507e3d80b7abf1e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ken Garlington Subject: Re: Fun with WebAda/GNAT Date: 1996/08/21 Message-ID: <321B1F6D.30F5@lmtas.lmco.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 175700010 references: <32120233.484C@lmtas.lmco.com> <4uv6bs$ffd@dfw.dfw.net> <3215B8EC.932@lmtas.lmco.com> <32181E12.7427@lmtas.lmco.com> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada x-mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Macintosh; I; 68K) Date: 1996-08-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Doug Smith wrote: > > Ohhh, but you can see other people's files. And you can surf the units > which gives you an edit button. Try this: [very long string follows] To which I say: Pish and tosh! It's a teaching compiler, for Pete's sake! Do we really need to protect each other's files from malicious access, or just accidental ones? My point was that providing the delete button should prevent _accidental_ deletions, which is certainly acceptable security for how I use WebAda. If someone needs to be better protected, let them copy their files to their local node periodically. I wouldn't waste too much time on an ultra-secure implementation. -- LMTAS - "Our Brand Means Quality"