From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,74a56083ffbe573d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ken Garlington Subject: Re: Zoo question Date: 1996/08/16 Message-ID: <32145A19.555C@lmtas.lmco.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 174584631 references: <320F16B6.6944@lmtas.lmco.com> <3210A142.2781E494@escmail.orl.mmc.com> <3211C462.19D9@lmtas.lmco.com> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada x-mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Macintosh; I; 68K) Date: 1996-08-16T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert Dewar wrote: > Now Ken, can you elucidate why you presented this example? We had a user report what appeared to be a code generation error against one of our compilers (the specific vendor to be nameless, for reasons which will become clear). The code was generating cage values as 1,2,3,4,5,_6_, etc. The response from the vendor was, "That's not a bug, Succ works on the base type." We checked, and of course Succ does work on the base type. However, as was noted, that's not relevant to the example. So, I decided to post the example, without an opinion as to whether it would work or not, and see who was right (us or the vendor). Thanks for all the input; we will include it when we resubmit the problem. -- LMTAS - "Our Brand Means Quality"