From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5ac12f5a60b1bfe X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,5ac12f5a60b1bfe X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: 101deb,f96f757d5586710a X-Google-Attributes: gid101deb,public From: lance@eco.twg.com (Lance Kibblewhite) Subject: Re: Ariane 5 - not an exception? Date: 1996/08/13 Message-ID: <3210f472.106232724@library.airnews.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 174006763 references: <4t9vdg$jfb@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> <31FE35BC.1A0D@sanders.lockheed.com> <4totv7$o9f@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> <4u6ukd$k82@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> <3209A6E6.17D4@phidani.be> <4upo1n$mm7@pheidippides.axion.bt.co.uk> organization: Attachmate Internet Products Group reply-to: lance@eco.twg.com newsgroups: comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.pl1 Date: 1996-08-13T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Roy Gardiner wrote: >Darius Blasband wrote: > >>PL/1 is one of the worst language design ever. As far as I know (or rather, >>as far as what I believe a good language design should be) only C++ >>comes close. >> >>IMHO... >> >>Darius > >Exactly the opposite of my view, and I am sure I am as unlikely to be >convinced of C++ as Darius is of PLI. > >So let me revive a question aired on this group once before: > >Who out there became expert in C first, and now prefers PLI? and vice >versa? > >All those persons who still prefer their 1st are ineligible to vote (I'm >out, PLI first) How about this, in order of learning. Language Preference. 1. FORTRAN FORTRAN (what else?) 2. COBOL FORTRAN 3. PASCAL PASCAL 4. PL/I PL/I 5. C PL/I 6. Ada Ada 7. C++ Ada Skipping things such as Prolog, Snobol, Lisp, APL, etc, which I consider intersting and useful, but never of primary interst.