From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fc89c,e2e7624a3542400a,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidfc89c,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,e2e7624a3542400a,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 1089ad,e2e7624a3542400a,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid1089ad,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,e2e7624a3542400a,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e2e7624a3542400a,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "P. Cnudde VH14 (8218)" <cnuddep@sh.bel.alcatel.be>
Subject: Software reuse
Date: 1996/08/12
Message-ID: <320EF9AB.42877E5C@sh.bel.alcatel.be>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 173665105
cc: jdla
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Alcatel Telecom
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: 
 comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.unix.programmer,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.vhdl
x-mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (X11; I; SunOS 4.1.3_U1 sun4m)
Date: 1996-08-12T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Hello,

First of all I want to say that the point of this mail is not
to start endless Ada vs C/C++ discussions, but to have an open
minded talk about Reuse and the influence of the language on reuse.

A lot of people talk about reuse but does anybody have experience
with a company wide reuse system. Not only different development
teams but also different locations should be supported. 

I see the following topics:
1. Language independent:
* Reuse database search methods
* Distribution of reusable components to the engineer who reuses
the component. (Source code or compiled version, function based or
library based)
* Can everybody in de company develop reusable modules or should only
one team make such functions
* is it usefull to reuse really small functions (<5 lines of code) 
or is the overhead to great. When is it usefull to think about reuse?
* What about the psychological problems (Not Invented Here)
* Who responsible for the reusable functions (the originator or the user)?
* How to avoid "Ariane-5" disasters? 

2. Language dependent.
* Language "Package-library" support. Is Ada here better ?
* Object Orientation, does it really help for reuse?
* Generics, (or templates) is it needed, or can we have a reuse
system without it?


PS. Does anybody in comp.lang.vhdl tried real reuse using VHDL.
(That's the language I am most interested in)

Regards,


-- 


   ____________          Peter Cnudde
   \          /          Alcatel Telecom
    \ ALCATEL/           Switching Systems Division 
     \ BELL /            Microelectronics Design Center
      \    /             
       \  /              F. Wellesplein 1, B-2018 Antwerp
        \/                                        BELGIUM
                         e-mail  : cnuddep@sh.bel.alcatel.be
                         Phone   : +32 3 240 82 18
                         Fax     : +32 3 240 99 47