From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,608e018aa2dff3f7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Dave Wood <dpw@thomsoft.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT vs other compilers
Date: 1996/08/10
Message-ID: <320BD470.6BDE@thomsoft.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 173263366
sender: news@thomsoft.com (USENET News Admin @flash)
x-nntp-posting-host: wood2
references: <4u7q2j$2d9@midgard.calvacom.fr> <3209156A.D75@thomsoft.com>
 <dewar.839546529@schonberg>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Thomson Software Products
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win95; I)
Date: 1996-08-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Robert Dewar wrote:
> [snip]

> 
> P.S. This is pushing the limits of what is appropriate to this newsgroup,
> but, I think, no more than Dave is pushing them :-)

Yeah, but you know, sometimes I like to shake things
up on comp.lang.gnat...

:)

-- Dave Wood
-- Product Manager, ObjectAda for Windows
-- http://www.thomsoft.com