From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,98e31cfcb43ed04e,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: The Quelisher <kendal@freenet.scri.fsu.edu>
Subject: What's the point?
Date: 1996/08/05
Message-ID: <32064473.59F6@freenet.scri.fsu.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 172535606
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Florida State University
mime-version: 1.0
reply-to: kendal@freenet.scri.fsu.edu
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 3.0b6 (Win16; I)
Date: 1996-08-05T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


If Ada95 allows dereferencing the ".all" call for pointer variables, 
then what's the point of even having a ".all" call in the first place?
Is this a carryover from Ada83 or something?
-- 
    *.........................................*
    .                |/                       .
    .                |\ENDAL                  .
    . WWW   => http://www.cs.fsu.edu/~vandyke .
    . EMail => kendal@freenet.scri.fsu.edu    .
    . Pager => (904) 297-6658                 .
    .                                         .
    *.........................................*