From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,45afe5f0a76ee29c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Chad Bremmon Subject: Re: Ada Foundation Classes Date: 1996/08/05 Message-ID: <3205E5D8.9EB@comm.hq.af.mil>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 172301297 references: <31FE15A6.53A@comm.hq.af.mil> <4to243$gjo@mdnews.btv.ibm.com> <32023C64.5808@thomsoft.com> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: SAM-GAPR mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada x-mailer: Mozilla 2.01Gold (WinNT; I) Date: 1996-08-05T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Dave Wood wrote: > > Dale Pontius wrote: > > > > In article <31FE15A6.53A@comm.hq.af.mil>, > > Chad Bremmon writes: > > > > > >I would like to get started on some work with > > >Portable Ada Foundation Classes. If any of you > > >have looked at the WWW site, you know it hasn't > > >been updated for a while. > > > > > The name Ada Foundation Class kind of smacks of Microsoft > > Foundation Class. There are a couple of points about this... > > I agree that a different name would be more > appropriate. We are providing a binding to > MFC as part of the ObjectAda for Windows > product line, under the name Ada Foundation > Classes. The notion of "Foundation Classes" > is pretty tightly tied to Windows and MFC in > particular, and especially bring to mind C++. > > You need something more generic, like > Canonical Ada Classes (CAC). I highly doubt that "Foundation Classes" is a trademark of Microsoft. Object Oriented also brings to mind C++ for most people. That doesn't mean Ada can't have foundation classes. Nor does it mean they have to match Microsoft's. I might suggest that your name should be something more specific like "Microsoft Foundation Classes for Ada." > > -- Dave Wood > -- ObjectAda for Windows: http://www.thomsoft.com > > "We do Ada... > We do Java... > We import C code... > But why botha?"