From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ed3864cb23152ae6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Bryce Bardin <bbardin@westdat.com>
Subject: Re: C++'s pointer vs Ada's Access type
Date: 1996/08/01
Message-ID: <3200BF25.49D4@westdat.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 171429141
references: <31FFD4A6.41C6@afit.af.mil> <DvFu6E.Atz.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Ada Consulting and Training
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Win95; I)
Date: 1996-08-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Tucker Taft wrote:

(Details omitted)

> In any case, the corresponding Ada would generally not use
> pointers at all:
> 
>     An_Array : array (1..100) of Integer;
> 
>     for I in An_Array'Range loop
>         An_Array[I] := 0;
>     end loop;
> 

Or, more likely in this simple case, just:

   An_Array : array (1 .. 100) of Integer := (others => 0);

Bryce Bardin