From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!h30g2000vbr.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Yannick_Duch=EAne_Hibou57?= <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Performance of access type : a tiny mistake in the WikiBook ?
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 16:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <31da5154-9739-4ead-8437-aaa5d70dc7e8@h30g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>
References: <91ad7397-27a8-4b9d-811e-6e62d485645c@v2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
	<C6F2D6E1.1275A5%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.75.149.141
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1254958246 21454 127.0.0.1 (7 Oct 2009 23:30:46
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 23:30:46 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: h30g2000vbr.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.75.149.141;
	posting-account=vrfdLAoAAAAauX_3XwyXEwXCWN3A1l8D
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1;
	fr),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8614
Date: 2009-10-07T16:30:46-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Hi Bill, and thanks for your reply

On 8 oct, 00:38, "(see below)" <yaldni...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> surely it should indicate the likely effect of the "not null"
> and "access constant" options as well.
That's a relevant comment indeed
You're right with that point

I came into it because I'm seeking about common performance
considerations. So I've found this article on WikiPedia.

I'm also seeking about informations on the average impact of inlined
in generics. The same WikiBook states it has bad impact on
performance, in the way it prevents the compiler from using code
sharing. But I wonder if it applies only to the actually inlined
methods or to the whole package.

I also wonder about any possible impact of an =93 Object :
Object_Type'Class =94 procedure/function argument type compared to a
view conversion in the method's body providing its argument type is
Object_Type instead of Object_Type'Class. In short, is there a typical
performance impact if I use (when the choice can be made) an
Object_Type'Class argument type or if I use an Object_Type argument
and a =93 My_Type'Class (My_Object) =94 inside the body (this latter
question is more related to references as well).