From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,66383f4b94d281e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: mdoernho@cais.com (Mark Doernhoefer) Subject: Re: Ada-95 Success Stories Date: 1996/05/23 Message-ID: <31a4eb29.1625999@news.cais.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 156417056 references: <319a6322.2564997@news.cais.com> <4nv2ts$n8k@ns1.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us> organization: Chantilly Tool & Dye reply-to: mdoernho@cais.com newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-05-23T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: OK, OK, so maybe I was too quick in asking for Ada-95 success stories. After reviewing the ACVC status for the various compilers from AdaIC, I gather no compiler is ready for heavy duty software development. Be that as it may, I'd really like to see early Ada-95 experiences from the trenches posted here. Keep in touch, Mark