From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,45afe5f0a76ee29c,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Chad Bremmon Subject: Ada Foundation Classes Date: 1996/07/30 Message-ID: <31FE15A6.53A@comm.hq.af.mil>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 171128397 content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: SAM-GAPR mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada x-mailer: Mozilla 2.01Gold (WinNT; I) Date: 1996-07-30T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: The WAdaS conference is over. . . I can try to get back to work now. . . or play as it may be. I would like to get started on some work with Portable Ada Foundation Classes. If any of you have looked at the WWW site, you know it hasn't been updated for a while. Here is what I request from the Ada community. 1. What do you need from foundation classes. Consider the microsoft foundation classes. But, consider that they need to be portable. Consider the Java API's. What if they were implemented on every platform. Consider "automatic" object distribution. Consider having CORBA written into the language. With a specification in the front that would allow the implementation to change over time. What I'm asking is: If you were given Ada foundation classes today, what would your requirements be? Please be as specific as possible. Please reply to bremmon@acm.org. 2. Who wants to help? I know I've had volunteers in the past. Please notify me again if you volunteered. 3. Is it worthy of a working group? This is a question for SIGada. Similar to the annexes, we could separate the classes as it made sense. Please let me know, Chad (bremmon@acm.org)