From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,803df5f3f60558d5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Theodore E. Dennison" Subject: Re: Uninitialized "out" parameters Date: 1996/07/24 Message-ID: <31F609B4.41C67EA6@escmail.orl.mmc.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 169858771 references: <31EEACDA.64880EEB@sage.inel.gov> <4stagp$3vg@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <4t1s3n$chv@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> <4t4r0s$8te@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Lockheed Martin Information Systems mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada x-mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; SunOS 4.1.3_U1 sun4m) Date: 1996-07-24T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Richard A. O'Keefe wrote: > If it comes to that, they are also told to compile with gcc, and I even > gave them a shell script to use that set -O2 -Wall, and they didn't do > that either. > > What this leads up to is that a compiler for *student* use needs to have > a high level of static checking switched *by default*. Why don't you have the default .cshrc (or .login) alias "gcc" to "gcc -O2 -Wall"? -- T.E.D. | Work - mailto:dennison@escmail.orl.mmc.com | | Home - mailto:dennison@iag.net | | URL - http://www.iag.net/~dennison |