From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6a9844368dd0a842
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: David Morton <dmorton@jinx.sckans.edu>
Subject: Re: seperate keyword and seperate compilation with Gnat?
Date: 1996/07/12
Message-ID: <31E647AE.C12A912@jinx.sckans.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 167983892
references: <31D95D93.28D8D15B@jinx.sckans.edu> <dewar.836427220@schonberg>
 <4rrdn0$10mk@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> <dewar.836853969@schonberg>
 <DuDwJC.C8B@world.std.com> <dewar.837119432@schonberg>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: student
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (X11; I; Linux 2.0.0 i486)
Date: 1996-07-12T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Robert Dewar wrote:
> 
> Bob Duff said
> 
> "What happens if you switch back and forth between the two options?
> 
> I presume gnatmake will be taught about this option also."
> 
> Actually it falls out pretty much free, needing a subunit that is
> separately compiled is extremely similar to needing a withed unit (maybe
> even identical) from gnatmake's point of view.

This is why I was wondering why subunits weren't 
able to be compiled separately...

Why does a "separate" procedure cause difficulty in the compiler
setting tasking structs and such, but "with"ing it doesn't?


-- 
David Morton
 mailto:dmorton@jinx.sckans.edu   http://www.sckans.edu/~dmorton/
 205 College, Winfield, KS 67156    
 This signature will self-destruct in 10 seconds...