From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e29c511c2b08561c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Jim Chelini Subject: Re: Is the "Ada mandate" being reconsidered? Date: 1996/07/11 Message-ID: <31E4F95A.7D48@east.thomsoft.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 168854844 sender: news@thomsoft.com references: <9606212019.AA11075@eight-ball> <4qqc4s$flv@felix.seas.gwu.edu> <4rrrvg$j9b@rational.rational.com> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Thomson Software Products mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada x-mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win95; I) Date: 1996-07-11T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Hi Joe, In at least one of the cases of FAA RFPs (WAAS)that you are referring to, the choice of langague was mandated to be C. However, in this case the FAA had already invested in a prototype system that was wriiten in C on PCs and they wanted to reuse some of this investment. The contractors now doing the job still have to figure out how they are going to certify this system to the FAA's standards (namily DO-178B). While doable (maybe) with a C implementation (plus OS), it would be easier in a controlled subset of Ada. Jim