From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6a9844368dd0a842 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: David Morton Subject: Re: *separate* keyword and *separate* compilation with Gnat? Date: 1996/07/03 Message-ID: <31DA6C14.55B6A8FD@jinx.sckans.edu>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 163473611 references: <31D95D93.28D8D15B@jinx.sckans.edu> <4rckva$dj1@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: student mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada x-mailer: Mozilla 3.0b3 (X11; I; Linux 2.0.0 i486) Date: 1996-07-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Samuel Mize wrote: > He's certainly right (at least for Ada83, and I *think* for Ada95) > (unless he's actually spelling it "seperate" in the code). > > >but gnat refuses to cleanly compile unless the file foo-bar.adb exists. > > The parent unit should compile (but not link). Might your gnat set-up > be automatically trying to link? (Just a wild guess.) > > Since I haven't seen this mentioned on comp.lang.ada, I assume it > isn't a problem with gnat itself. > > Samuel Mize No, gnat doesn't link automatically, so I'm at loss for words... -- David Morton mailto:dmorton@jinx.sckans.edu // If you use Netscape 2.0, 205 College, Winfield, KS 67156 // you can click on the mailto: part to reply! (HINT, HINT) :)