From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e283979660f903f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Theodore E. Dennison" Subject: Re: GNAT 301a with Win95 Date: 1996/06/24 Message-ID: <31CEC787.446B9B3D@escmail.orl.mmc.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 161925385 references: <31C94219.794BDF32@escmail.orl.mmc.com> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Lockheed Martin Information Systems mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada x-mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; SunOS 4.1.3_U1 sun4m) Date: 1996-06-24T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Vadim Epmak wrote: > > Hello Theodore! > > 20 Jun 96, Theodore E. Dennison writes to All: > > TED> Gnat is an Ada (95) compiler. If your "University account" is an Ada 83 > TED> compiler, then there is no guarantee that code from one will compile with > TED> the other without errors. They are two (slightly) different languages. > > How about -gnat83 option ? 8) > That's helpful, but not bulletproof. Try using it with Sequential_IO. (Well...I haven't tried this lately, but 2 years ago it wouldn't work). -- T.E.D. | Work - mailto:dennison@escmail.orl.mmc.com | | Home - mailto:dennison@iag.net | | URL - http://www.iag.net/~dennison |