From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e29c511c2b08561c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Theodore E. Dennison" <dennison@escmail.orl.mmc.com>
Subject: Re: Is the "Ada mandate" being reconsidered?
Date: 1996/06/18
Message-ID: <31C68739.41C67EA6@escmail.orl.mmc.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 160799429
references: <4mq7mg$8hs@jake.probe.net>
	<bell-0306960825410001@rmbell.fw.hac.com>
 <4peu0v$rfq@news15.erols.com>	<1996Jun10.114827.26046@relay.nswc.navy.mil>
	<4pk5sm$i7k@gde.GDEsystems.COM> <JSA.96Jun11223109@organon.com>
 <4pn0rs$mbe@gde.GDEsystems.COM> <4pnd5c$6j7@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
 <4ppceg$gha@gde.GDEsystems.COM> <dewar.834696735@schonberg>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Lockheed Martin Information Systems
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; SunOS 4.1.3_U1 sun4m)
Date: 1996-06-18T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Robert Dewar wrote:
> using non-validated compilers, including GNAT. In particular, Airfields,
> the first deployed Ada 95 DoD application (if you know an earlier one,
> speak up :-) used GNAT on a non-validated platform (Solaris).

Would summer of '93 beat it?

Of course said project should probably have used at least ONE new feature to
qualify...


-- 
T.E.D.          
                |  Work - mailto:dennison@escmail.orl.mmc.com  |
                |  Home - mailto:dennison@iag.net              |
                |  URL  - http://www.iag.net/~dennison         |