From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c239006be68d86aa X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Theodore E. Dennison" Subject: Re: GNAT on Win 95 Date: 1996/06/07 Message-ID: <31B87053.1CFBAE39@escmail.orl.mmc.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 159032700 references: <9606061920.AA20504@eight-ball> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Lockheed Martin Information Systems mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada x-mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; SunOS 4.1.3_U1 sun4m) Date: 1996-06-07T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Bob Crispen wrote: > > I don't recall how I came to know this (perhaps it was from reading > the documents, but that's highly unlikely ;-) but there's a mailing > list where Tom Griest sends announcements about Gnat for Win32. > For example, last night I got the announcement of the availability > of 3.04a. Availability where? Its not at cs.nyu.edu (at least not in any obvious place). > What you experienced was a bug that there was already a patch out there > for. I'm glad the recompile went fine, but it really wasn't necessary. Patch? That's not at cs.nyu.edu either. Isn't nyu the "official" source for gnat distributions? Does Labtek have their own distribution site? -- T.E.D. | Work - mailto:dennison@escmail.orl.mmc.com | | Home - mailto:dennison@iag.net | | URL - http://www.iag.net/~dennison |