From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10db24,12f4d07c572005e3 X-Google-Attributes: gid10db24,public X-Google-Thread: ff6c8,12f4d07c572005e3 X-Google-Attributes: gidff6c8,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,12f4d07c572005e3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,12f4d07c572005e3 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,12f4d07c572005e3 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public From: Ken Garlington Subject: Re: Java Risks (Was: Ada News Brief - 96-05-24 Date: 1996/06/03 Message-ID: <31B2B06A.43FE@lmtas.lmco.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 158235541 references: <4o56db$p66@ns1.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us> <4omoh4$k0f@ansible.bbt.com> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.sw.components,comp.object,comp.software-eng,comp.edu x-mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (Macintosh; I; 68K) Date: 1996-06-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Brian N. Miller wrote: > > > A disbelieve that C++ is evolving awkwardly. Is there a publication > which claims so? Or is this 2-bit usenet opinion? ;') See Plauger's comments in Embedded Systems Programming, for example. (I'm not sure why an opinion in a publication is necessarily better than one on the Internet, but nonetheless, there it is...) -- LMTAS - "Our Brand Means Quality"