From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ea4f04ec8d41f5b7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ken Garlington <garlingtonke@lmtas.lmco.com>
Subject: Re: Ada83 equivalents for Ada95
Date: 1996/05/29
Message-ID: <31ABFED5.5793@lmtas.lmco.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 157350180
references: <md5:0CCFC2005521EA8746533FEB9AA03D75> <Dr70x4.Drs@world.std.com>
 <31A66DAA.7418@sud.ed.ray.com>
 <bbalfour-2805961408500001@stmac0088.std.caci.com> <Ds4yxt.7wJ@world.std.com>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (Macintosh; I; 68K)
Date: 1996-05-29T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Robert A Duff wrote:
> 
> In article <bbalfour-2805961408500001@stmac0088.std.caci.com>,
> Brad Balfour <bbalfour@std.caci.com> wrote:
> >There are even tools available that you can purchase which will
> >automatically detect these problems in your Ada 83 code.
> 
> Which tools are those?

Two non-compiler tools promoted at TRI-Ada '95 that look
for Ada 95 incompatibilities in Ada 83 code:

* Ada-ASSURED 3.0 from GrammaTech (info@grammatech.com)

* Ada9X Transition Aid from Software Compositions (swcinfo@aol.com)


-- 
LMTAS - "Our Brand Means Quality"