From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,66383f4b94d281e6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Theodore E. Dennison" <dennison@escmail.orl.mmc.com>
Subject: Re: Ada-95 Success Stories
Date: 1996/05/28
Message-ID: <31AADD16.167EB0E7@escmail.orl.mmc.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 157134706
references: <4o31vk$cba@news1.delphi.com> <dewar.832914923@schonberg>
 <31A5F514.2F1CF0FB@escmail.orl.mmc.com> <dewar.833041095@schonberg>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Lockheed Martin Information Systems
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; SunOS 4.1.3_U1 sun4m)
Date: 1996-05-28T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Robert Dewar wrote:
> 
> "I'd have to agree whole-heartedly with that. I could take or leave tagged types,
> but I'm awaiting the "valid" attribute with baited breath. Never will I fear
> changing optimization levels again!"
> 
> The valid attribute is implemented in GNAT, and, as far we we know, and as
> our tests indicate, works fine.

I would have expected no less. Perhaps on my next job, I'll be using a 
platform GNAT is validated on (not on this one, though).

-- 
T.E.D.          
                |  Work - mailto:dennison@escmail.orl.mmc.com  |
                |  Home - mailto:dennison@iag.net              |
                |  URL  - http://www.iag.net/~dennison         |