From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,66383f4b94d281e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Theodore E. Dennison" Subject: Re: Ada-95 Success Stories Date: 1996/05/22 Message-ID: <31A31039.2781E494@escmail.orl.mmc.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 156105528 references: <319a6322.2564997@news.cais.com> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Lockheed Martin Information Systems mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada x-mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; SunOS 4.1.3_U1 sun4m) Date: 1996-05-22T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Richard B. Johns wrote: > > In article <319a6322.2564997@news.cais.com>, mdoernho@cais.com wrote: > > > Hey Gang, > > > > It's 1996 and there are several validated Ada-95 compilers available. > > Can anybody post an Ada-95 success story? (Ulterior motive: I'd like > > to know which compiler is mature enough for serious software > > development.) Please provide details of your experience including > > host, target, rough SLOC count or relative size measure, compiler > > vendor and version, and which specialized needs annexes were critical > > to your development. > > Well, this post is 6 days old, and there are no replys. Guess the answer > is "NO!";-). Well, a couple of years ago I delivered a small project (~1000 ";"'s) written with an early, buggy verson of Gnat. As it was delivered early and under budget, and I haven't heard a single report of a bug in it since, I would consider it a success. However, since it was basicly converted Ada83 code, and I had to work around some GNAT bugs (2 years ago, remember), I don't think it would fit the original poster's definition. -- T.E.D. | Work - mailto:dennison@escmail.orl.mmc.com | | Home - mailto:dennison@iag.net | | URL - http://www.iag.net/~dennison |