From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,66383f4b94d281e6,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: mdoernho@cais.com (Mark Doernhoefer)
Subject: Ada-95 Success Stories
Date: 1996/05/15
Message-ID: <319a6322.2564997@news.cais.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 155023343
organization: Chantilly Tool & Dye
reply-to: mdoernho@cais.com
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-05-15T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Hey Gang,

It's 1996 and there are several validated Ada-95 compilers available.
Can anybody post an Ada-95 success story?  (Ulterior motive: I'd like
to know which compiler is mature enough for serious software
development.)  Please provide details of your experience including
host, target, rough SLOC count or relative size measure, compiler
vendor and version, and which specialized needs annexes were critical
to your development.

Please post to the newsgroup so open discussion can follow up.

THANKS,
Mark