From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,83242c369c5dc9b0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: Book REview Date: 1996/05/13 Message-ID: <319767A1.11AC@io.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 154589078 references: <4mk0vc$opp@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> <3190CEC1.5799@io.com> <4muo9j$4hp@goanna.cs.rmit.EDU.AU> <4musoq$88i@goanna.cs.rmit.EDU.AU> to: "Richard A. O'Keefe" cc: davedave@io.com content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: PSI Public Usenet Link mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada x-mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (Win16; I) Date: 1996-05-13T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Richard A. O'Keefe wrote: Richard O'Keefe has argued his position very well. I now concede that I was mostly wrong, and Richard was largely correct. -- Dave Jones davedave@io.com