From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ea4f04ec8d41f5b7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "James A. Squire" Subject: Re: Ada83 equivalents for Ada95 Date: 1996/05/10 Message-ID: <3193BA1E.31C1@csehp3.mdc.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 154198329 sender: Ada programming language references: comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: MDA Avionics Tools & Processes mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada x-mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (X11; I; HP-UX A.09.01 9000/715) Date: 1996-05-10T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: On Fri, 10 May 1996 14:15:04 GMT, Robert A Duff wrote: > In article <31927190.35AA@csehp3.mdc.com>, > James A. Squire wrote: > >Has anybody gone to the trouble of translating code that uses features > >new to Ada95 back into its Ada83 equivalent? If anyone knows of such > >examples that are available on the Internet, please let me know (email > >or comp.lang.ada). > > I don't know of any such effort. > > I'm curious as to why you want this. Do you want to develop Ada 95 > code, but then run it on a system where Ada 95 does not yet exist, but > Ada 83 compilers do exist? No. I wanted to be able to show "what you have to go through to do in Ada83" and do comparisons. -- James Squire MDA Avionics Tools & Processes ja_squire@csehp3.mdc.com "one of these days I'm going to better myself by going to Knight school" "You'll be a web knight instead of a web page!"