From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,5db2a4f776607ef6 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.130.35 with SMTP id ob3mr2971890pbb.8.1332308661064; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 22:44:21 -0700 (PDT) Path: kz5ni15084pbc.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Per Sandberg Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada advocacy Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 22:37:08 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <31909692.1619.1332308228840.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbhv6> References: <19595886.4450.1332248078686.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbbfy7> <2012032020582259520-rblove@airmailnet> NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.227.136.70 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1332308660 27936 127.0.0.1 (21 Mar 2012 05:44:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 05:44:20 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <2012032020582259520-rblove@airmailnet> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=83.227.136.70; posting-account=CFhTFgoAAACoj152uaoYhYRq1_SwAkgF User-Agent: G2/1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: 2012-03-20T22:37:08-07:00 List-Id: On Wednesday, March 21, 2012 2:58:22 AM UTC+1, Robert Love wrote: > On 2012-03-20 12:54:38 +0000, tonyg said: > > > I am currently fending off an attempt to have my project converted from > > ADA to some un named monstrosity of a language. Reasons listed are ADA > > is archaic, programmers can not be found, it takes too long to develop > > blah blah list goes on. Anyone got any glossy monosyllabillic advocacy > > documents hopefully in an entertaining cartoon format? > > Good luck. I'm currently watching NASA throw away many 100K sloc of > Ada that's worked for 10 years to replace it with C++. It's being done > in the name of preparing for the future but really, I think it's a jobs > program, sad to say. The C++ guys sometimes sneer at Ada but we find > it funny that they haven't fully comprehended the scope of the problem > yet. I'm sure they'll get there eventually but as tax payers (if > you're US) it's very frustrating. And some roumurs says: Thare are still small teams of programmers doing backports of some of the NASA C/C++ SW to Ada again, and they are finding "intresting" bugs that are repored back to NASA again.