From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.129.79.3 with SMTP id d3mr23768469ywb.37.1436500009127; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 20:46:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.39.136 with SMTP id p8mr145856obk.8.1436500009062; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 20:46:49 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!z61no28832qge.0!news-out.google.com!a16ni13531ign.0!nntp.google.com!qs7no3284947igc.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 20:46:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <592bdded-e693-40d3-a78f-84f4270c8008@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=50.138.108.113; posting-account=yiWntAoAAAC1KqC_shmxJYv07B9l6LNU NNTP-Posting-Host: 50.138.108.113 References: <592bdded-e693-40d3-a78f-84f4270c8008@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <318e5fe5-17bb-457c-93ae-4f8d774cce6d@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: GNOGA v1.1 Released - Ada Cloud Desktop and Mobile Development From: David Botton Injection-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 03:46:49 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Received-Bytes: 2159 X-Received-Body-CRC: 1501399017 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:26734 Date: 2015-07-09T20:46:48-07:00 List-Id: > Question: If there's a compiler taking .NET to ASM.js, then would the run= time encumbrance (or anything really) stick with if you processed it? After= all, the output of that DOTNET-to-JS would be, at best, a "derivative work= ". That is what the license virus does, it makes your work a derivative work a= nd so get the GPL even if you don't want it and even if the FSF never inten= ded it. > And *IF* the runtime is encumbered, would it be feasible to use the pragm= a-restrictions to avoid it? Given the past record of ridiculous claims like "downloading from site X ov= errides stated licenses" prank or false IP scares, I highly doubt you won't= here claim the generated binder file is GPL so that pragma may not be enou= gh. (There is no FSF .NET version). David Botton