From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,15890893c0618a8a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ken Garlington <garlingtonke@lmtas.lmco.com>
Subject: Re: [Q] Tools for Ada Quality and Style
Date: 1996/04/30
Message-ID: <3185E4A8.750D@lmtas.lmco.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 152243246
references: <9604172134.AA27114@eight-ball> <767968529wnr@diphi.demon.co.uk>
 <4ltjat$dao@parlor.hiwaay.net> <dewar.830719362@schonberg>
 <165492028wnr@diphi.demon.co.uk>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (Macintosh; I; 68K)
Date: 1996-04-30T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


JP Thornley wrote:
> 
> I would be (almost) as happy with an automated conformance checker.  (I
> can't see manual conformance checking being a possibility unless the
> culture is established right at the start.)

Note that, by and large, the tools I recommended are more conformance checkers
than pretty-printers (although some of them may do both).

-- 
LMTAS - "Our Brand Means Quality"