From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,42427d0d1bf647b1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ken Garlington Subject: Re: Ada Core Technologies and Ada95 Standards Date: 1996/04/26 Message-ID: <3180C63F.20EE@lmtas.lmco.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 151580239 references: <00001a73+00002c20@msn.com> <828038680.5631@assen.demon.co.uk> <828127251.85@assen.demon.co.uk> <315FD5C9.342F@lfwc.lockheed.com> <3160EFBF.BF9@lfwc.lockheed.com> <829851188.11037@assen.demon.co.uk> <830205883.24190@assen.demon.co.uk> <317CB1C1.431F@lmtas.lmco.com> <830369569.19364@assen.demon.co.uk> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada x-mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (Macintosh; I; 68K) Date: 1996-04-26T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert Dewar wrote: > > I suspect that Ken has not looked at them either. Ken, you keep asking > about how the ACVC process is being improved? Why not look? Why not read the older posts where I said I _did_ look, going so far as to quote from the ACVC documents I reviewed on the AdaIC server? Why not read my response to Mr. McCabe, discussing what I found? Why not answer my questions regarding what I _couldn't_ find, AFTER the review? If you have other documents you wish for me to review (and they, in fact, can be accessed in a reasonably easy fashion), please feel free to send me pointers to them. If not, please discontinue asking me to review something that you can't identify? -- LMTAS - "Our Brand Means Quality"