From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,42427d0d1bf647b1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ken Garlington <garlingtonke@lmtas.lmco.com>
Subject: Re: Ada Core Technologies and Ada95 Standards
Date: 1996/04/26
Message-ID: <3180C57E.630C@lmtas.lmco.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 151580228
references: <00001a73+00002c20@msn.com> <dewar.828157508@schonberg>
 <315FD5C9.342F@lfwc.lockheed.com> <828474655.17825@assen.demon.co.uk>
 <Dp96KG.K7@world.std.com> <829673790.5774@assen.demon.co.uk>
 <dewar.829684499@schonberg> <830205885.24190@assen.demon.co.uk>
 <317CB211.3DBA@lmtas.lmco.com> <dewar.830399899@schonberg>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (Macintosh; I; 68K)
Date: 1996-04-26T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Robert Dewar wrote:
> 
> your experience with compiler implementation, or F22 code. If you are
> speaking of experience in implementing a compiler, what compiler?
> Because I have worked on many commercial compilers, and NEVER found
> this to be true.

It is the F-22 program's experience that, of the hundreds of change 
requests we as users have submitted to our compiler vendors, the 
majority have test cases which are both small and non-proprietary.

-- 
LMTAS - "Our Brand Means Quality"