From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,42427d0d1bf647b1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Theodore E. Dennison" <dennison@escmail.orl.mmc.com>
Subject: Re: Ada Core Technologies and Ada95 Standards
Date: 1996/04/25
Message-ID: <3180088C.773C2448@escmail.orl.mmc.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 151509337
references: <9604241816.AA07770@most> <dewar.830442459@schonberg>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Lockheed Martin Information Systems
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; SunOS 4.1.3_U1 sun4m)
Date: 1996-04-25T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Robert Dewar wrote:
> Note that the early stages of Ada 95 deliberately *do* allow subsetting
> in the transitional period, but that ends next year, and in 1997, once
> again, usable Ada compilers must compile the entire language.
> 

Hmmm. What does this imply for compilers that are now validated, but
might not get "the entire language" working by the end of the 
transitional period. For that matter, will every one have to 
re-validate next year? (Incurring that expense yet again)


-- 
T.E.D.          
                |  Work - mailto:dennison@escmail.orl.mmc.com  |
                |  Home - mailto:dennison@iag.net              |
                |  URL  - http://www.iag.net/~dennison         |