From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f11be6a377ed3f42
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: david.elliot@ukonline.co.uk (David Elliot)
Subject: Re: OpenVMS Ada95 Capability (was ACT & Ada95 in comp.lang.ada)
Date: 1996/04/24
Message-ID: <317e89f4.1024556@news.ukonline.co.uk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 151262489
references: <DqAD5w.5Fx@plato.ds.boeing.com> <317CB356.4E2E@lmtas.lmco.com>
organization: UK Online
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-04-24T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I'd certainly be interested in a Vax Ada95.

We'd like to transfer from DEC Ada83 to a single Ada95 supported
on the various platforms we use (Vax, Alpha VMS/Unix, SG, Sun).
Currently the Vax VMS platform seems to be the sticking point
as far as GNAT is concerned.  (We've too many Vaxes in the field
to replace them with Alphas)...

Ken Garlington <garlingtonke@lmtas.lmco.com> wrote:

>nickerson@mirage.vms.boeing.com wrote:
>> 
>> I am interested in more information about Ada95 on Digital OpenVMS.
>
>> 1) Will both VAX and Alpha be supported and what OS versions?
>
>Are you actually interested in Ada 95 support for VAX/VMS?
>
>Well, that would be two official indications of interest on c.l.a., then.
>Do I hear three?