From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10f8a1,b240aa46c5ff18d X-Google-Attributes: gid10f8a1,public X-Google-Thread: f7cd1,b240aa46c5ff18d X-Google-Attributes: gidf7cd1,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,b240aa46c5ff18d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-03-03 00:30:33 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,vmsnet.misc,vmsnet.alpha Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!redstone.interpath.net!ambra.drcoffsite.com!not-for-mail From: kahn@ambra.drcoffsite.com (Larry Kahn) Subject: Re: Ada 95 for VMS? Message-ID: <317cb$12223.29b@ambra.drcoffsite.com> Date: Wed, 01 Mar 1995 06:34:35 GMT Distribution: world Organization: Dynamics Research Corp. X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.14 NT References: <3j0gjq$h64@news.aero.org> Xref: bga.com comp.lang.ada:10784 vmsnet.misc:1238 vmsnet.alpha:2079 Date: 1995-03-01T06:34:35+00:00 List-Id: In article <3j0gjq$h64@news.aero.org>, johnson@skyvu.aero.org says... > > >Does Digital have any intention of developing an Ada 95 compiler for VMS? >I just spoke to someone at Rational who stated that there will be one >developed for OSF/1 on the Alpha only. How about the VAX and VMS? I >already know the reasons why they might not. I'm just looking for some >kind of verification (preferably from DEC people "in-the-know"). > I'm not a dec person in the know but from talking to dec and rational people at the last tri-ada the answer is NO. Instead of developing a compiler I was lead to believe they will use the rational compiler ported to vms.... -- Laurence G. Kahn Senior Software Engineer Dynamics Research Corp. (Finger .site@ambra.drcoffsite.com for PGP public key.)