From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1bce3f54cf1cba1b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Theodore E. Dennison" <dennison@escmail.orl.mmc.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT Executables: How low can you go?
Date: 1996/04/22
Message-ID: <317BB057.167EB0E7@escmail.orl.mmc.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 150821836
references: <4kmq7a$egm@fozzie.sun3.iaf.nl> <dewar.829400646@schonberg>
 <4l0o3s$hgt@utrhcs.cs.utwente.nl> <31742475.1CFBAE39@escmail.orl.mmc.com>
 <Pine.SUN.3.91.960417100245.1349B-100000@fozzie.sun3.iaf.nl>
 <317688E9.2781E494@escmail.orl.mmc.com>
 <4la39f$ils@dfw-ixnews3.ix.netcom.com>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Lockheed Martin Information Systems
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; SunOS 4.1.3_U1 sun4m)
Date: 1996-04-22T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Al Christians wrote:
> 
> I have worked in situations with networked DOS PC's in which the
> executable sizes are very important.  Some systems are too big to be a

We're not talking DOS, we're talking OS/2.

-- 
T.E.D.          
                |  Work - mailto:dennison@escmail.orl.mmc.com  |
                |  Home - mailto:dennison@iag.net              |
                |  URL  - http://www.iag.net/~dennison         |