From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1bce3f54cf1cba1b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Theodore E. Dennison" Subject: Re: GNAT Executables: How low can you go? Date: 1996/04/18 Message-ID: <31768D19.446B9B3D@escmail.orl.mmc.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 148223360 references: <4kmq7a$egm@fozzie.sun3.iaf.nl> <4l0o3s$hgt@utrhcs.cs.utwente.nl> <31742475.1CFBAE39@escmail.orl.mmc.com> <4l3h04$6si@linus.mitre.org> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Lockheed Martin Information Systems mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada x-mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; SunOS 4.1.3_U1 sun4m) Date: 1996-04-18T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Michael F Brenner wrote: > > There is no need to justify tiny executables, 140K is a Bloated hello-world. Its still 140K, just in two different files. (sigh) I guess I'm alone in thinking this is just "re-arranging the deck chairs"? -- T.E.D. | Work - mailto:dennison@escmail.orl.mmc.com | | Home - mailto:dennison@iag.net | | URL - http://www.iag.net/~dennison |