From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,894846be18e92713,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Greg Bond <bond@ee.ubc.ca>
Subject: GNAT R/T Annex and Win95
Date: 1996/04/16
Message-ID: <3174712D.71C7@ee.ubc.ca>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 147915726
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Dept. of Electrical Eng., UBC
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
Date: 1996-04-16T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

My understanding is that Win95 uses a timesliced scheduling policy for 
threads, and that GNAT tasks are mapped to Win95 threads. How is 
GNAT's fixed priority preemptive scheduling policy supported if this 
is the case?

--
* Greg Bond                         * Dept. of Electrical Eng.  
* email: bond@ee.ubc.ca             * Univ. of British Columbia      
* voice: (604) 822 0899             * 2356 Main Mall                 
* fax:   (604) 822 5949             * Vancouver, BC              
* web: http://www.ee.ubc.ca/~bond   * Canada, V6T 1Z4