From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9a91d3b1940f5c4c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ken Garlington <garlingtonke@lfwc.lockheed.com>
Subject: Re: Ada is Ouchless
Date: 1996/04/15
Message-ID: <3172A024.6B82@lfwc.lockheed.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 147702697
references: <DpsyKG.365@eskimo.com>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (Macintosh; I; 68K)
Date: 1996-04-15T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Daniel Grambihler wrote:
> 
> Given that the specification and requirements level of software development
> is still in a fairly sorry state, what types of inroads are being
> made toward improving *those* areas?

Some of the things that are floating around:

1. New processes (e.g. CoRE from SPC)

2. New(er) tools (RTM, DOORS)

3. New standards (and I forget the specifics, but there is a group working on
new system engineering standards, that should help software.)