From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f92fbb4a0420dd57 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Mike Young Subject: Re: some questions re. Ada/GNAT from a C++/GCC user Date: 1996/04/02 Message-ID: <3161F8A4.36A5@mcs.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 145541151 references: <3160B03B.5230@mcs.com> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Fen Software, Inc. mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada x-mailer: Mozilla 2.01Gold (Win95; I) Date: 1996-04-02T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: David Shochat wrote: > > RM95 3.11/7: > "The elaboration of a declarative_part consists of the elaboration of > the declarative_items, if any, in the order in which they are given > in the declarative_part." > > Maybe you were thinking of the actual parameters in a subprogram call > (6.4/10). > -- ========= Thank you all for the copious correction. I confused it with the Eiffel books that I am currently plowing through in parallel with Ada. A Java bigot in the next office started a local renaissance of sorts in regards to OO languages. I'm finding many things to like in Ada (tasking tops the list), but still looking for compelling reason... Mike.