From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,91ece1fca423bb9d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ken Garlington <garlingtonke@lfwc.lockheed.com>
Subject: Re: How Strict is DOD Ada Requirement?
Date: 1996/03/25
Message-ID: <315699B7.3278@lfwc.lockheed.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 144102046
references: <4iuhsf$hg8@siberia.gtri.gatech.edu>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Macintosh; I; 68K)
Date: 1996-03-25T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

William S Marshall IV wrote:
> 
> Does anyone have any insights or experience as to how this affects the
> mandate to use Ada in DOD systems?

I do know that in one of the test case procurements for minimizing MIL-SPECs,
only two MIL-STDs were levied. One of them was Ada.

As to whether this experience will be the common implementation, I'm not sure
anyone knows yet...