From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,55ad689dc8c82d8c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ted Dennison <dennison@escmail.orl.mmc.com>
Subject: Re: Ada policy enforcement
Date: 1996/03/22
Message-ID: <3152E235.16F4@escmail.orl.mmc.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 143721447
references: <31515445.28DB@lfwc.lockheed.com> <4ism6v$dfr@ra.nrl.navy.mil>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Lockheed Martin Marine Systems
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; HP-UX A.09.01 9000/750)
Date: 1996-03-22T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Richard Pitre wrote:
> 
> If Ada were *manifestly* better then there would be no need to enforce it.
> Enforcment is the last refuge of the terminaly confused and soon to be
> extinct. (Contract specification is a different matter, and yes you
> can spank me for the unattributed misquote.)

Sorta' like seatbelts?

-- 
T.E.D.          
                |  Work - mailto:dennison@escmail.orl.mmc.com  |
                |  Home - mailto:dennison@iag.net              |
                |  URL  - http://www.iag.net/~dennison         |