From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,16e3a8dd4f3ab3f3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ken Garlington <garlingtonke@lfwc.lockheed.com>
Subject: Re: Elaboration order
Date: 1996/03/18
Message-ID: <314D302E.11A2@lfwc.lockheed.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 143623128
references: <314701A1.469D@lfwc.lockheed.com>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Macintosh; I; 68K)
Date: 1996-03-18T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Robert I. Eachus wrote:
> 
>    BUT, and this is what makes it so painless, either your program
> runs or you get PROGRAM_ERROR right off the bat, so leaving out a
> (potentially) required pragma Elaborate is pretty harmless.

I have to tell you, a development philosophy that says, "Oh, well,
if I make a mistake, I'll see an exception" rubs me the wrong way.
Maybe I just don't have that Ada mindset...