From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5cebec2c33ffff82
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ken Garlington <garlingtonke@lfwc.lockheed.com>
Subject: Re: AJPO is still clueless about the reality of DoD Ada rejection
Date: 1996/03/18
Message-ID: <314D2FA6.24D4@lfwc.lockheed.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 143745175
references: <DoBuMy.41z@world.std.com>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Macintosh; I; 68K)
Date: 1996-03-18T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Gregory Aharonian wrote:

> Look, COTS and the Ada Mandate are incompatible, and where they aren't,
> Ada is still rejected anyways by DoD programmers.

I can't speak for the rest of the world, but I know of a few million lines of
F-22 Ada code that says otherwise.